finn said:
A few states actually allow open carry of firearms, like Virginia, without needing any kind of carry permit.
I dunno about VA, but I know Vermont has no "gun control" laws (and I thought it was the only state without any, or perhaps it just has less than any other state).
Still - even in Vermont, I'll bet - you can't walk into a grocery store carrying a rifle, not even a shotgun 'broken' over your shoulder, even if the place doesn't have a notice banning weapons.
I guess you could do it, but I'm sure the cops would be called, and you'd have some kind of charge or at least a Disturbing-The-Peace ticket.
I believe the typical law for most places is something about "brandishing weapons for intimidation". (I'd guess this is
part of the reason for gun racks, so they're not concealed but also not sitting on the seat where could be used against Johnny Law.)
Widerstand said:
Also just what are you trying to get at with this post?
finn said:
I don't really get the nature of this post either.
I'm very surprised that you guys are confused by this, it's not complicated and you're not stupid fellas.
Am I trying to see if someone will give me a gun? Do I want to know who's carrying on their travels, so I can steer clear of them or rob them as they sleep? No.
In my previous post, I mentioned getting interested in guns of late; specifically (I guess), toward developing armed response to whatever communities don't like.
Because I don't own any guns, I can't shoot at most ranges (bring-your-own places); I did shoot a couple pistols at a range in NorCal which offered borrower guns for use there.
And getting into guns at this point seems like learning to swim in the deep end of the pool. I'm having to go through a lot of jargon and abbreviations and then figure out what they mean, there doesn't seem to be too much created for beginners.
Widerstand said:
Whats your takes on the firearms issue in this country?
I think that the Right talks about "defending the country" but does nothing when Cheney & Bush & that whole cabal violate the Constitution (supposedly sacred to the patriots) and infringe upon American rights, not to mention violating international law. The gun owners of the Right seem pretty accepting of oppression when the perpetrators are Americans.
On the other hand is the Left, and I'll include anarchists in this group too, which talks much about "Revolution", but also does nothing.
So I've been looking at guns lately, so
I too can do nothing but complain, of course.
As you said, people carry but don't practice, and can lose their gun to the attacker. Or, there are those stats which say the house gun is more likely to be used against a family member than an intruder. And just this gun mag I was reading had a few cases about some cop nearly shooting his elderly mom, or some guy killing a Japanese exchange student who entered the wrong house when looking for a party. Guns are easily-available, dangerous, and can quickly create a lot of injury (or death).
I think there are probably enough weapons that people could fight back, house-to-house against a military, or defend themselves against attackers/intruders. I'm pretty sure our "freedom" wouldn't decrease, nor would our oppression increase, if these factories closed down.
I guess I don't believe in restricting gun ownership, but I don't know of any real justification for keeping the factories running, pumping out more and more guns. Because the violent, criminal underclass is growing, and arming? Because something like a Zapatista army is secretly being formed here in the US? Because there are a handful of wealthy dudes with tiny dicks who really need to gather 400 guns of every kind?