The problem with this is that the essential structure of Christianity remains intact in any form of political idealism. You are guilty of Original Sin, do your penance, get jacked up on self-righteous belief, and you'll get to the Heaven of a Just world. I have a "dumb white mouth", and if only I police myself and feel all the right forms of guilt, working myself into a neurotic True Believer, racism will end. Nevermind that white supremacy consists of
material realities that have essentially nothing to do with language or the behavior of the individual - unless the individual behaves as a guerilla soldier in a
material struggle against racist systems and struggles. True, I agree there isn't much reason to use what are commonly understood to be "slurs"; but I take issue with the philosophical road you tread to reach that conclusion. I think the tools you use to get there are weak and, to be completely frank, absolutely misguided.
You post a knee-jerk reaction to Nietzschean ideas, but Nietzsche formulated the ideas he did from watching this exact sequence play out over and over since the Enlightenment. His concept of Slave Morality is essentially that in hierarchical societies, a master class exists, and enforces their superiority (however arbitrary) onto a class of slaves who are denied the means to effectively resist their oppression; What happens from here is
resentiment, (wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment) where an impotent group of the oppressed turn the hatred they have for their captors inwards, into a culture of mad revenge fantasies and self-hatred. Eventually, this culture takes on a life of its own, until it is divorced from its origins in master-slave society. Christianity epitomized this. The climax of the Christian revenge fantasy is found in the day that
the meek shall inherit the earth, by "turning the other cheek" and doing penance for their sins; it is a fantasy that is utterly divorced from the bones of history, that has no tactical relevance or bearing on the processes of history. Slave morality, then, comprises a set of philosophical narcotics that make the self-hating follower of slave-revenge cults doped up enough to acquiesce with the world around them, and in fact, to ultimately serve the very master class they hated to begin with. It is a genius trick on the part of the empowered to circulate resistance back into itself, such that power goes untouched. Along the way, for the individual, this process means a life of guilt and inefficacy, where one's failure to alter the fundamental conditions of the world around them makes them more self-hating, and their self-hatred in turn even further reduces their efficacy in changing their world.
This is pathetic and the path to an impoverished existence.
I am by no means engaging in some kind of "don't tell me what to say, mom, Nietzsche said you can't" rhetoric in applying these ideas here. I am an individualist, completely and totally. The closest thing I have to a philosophical certainty is that I exist - I desire, and I have unique qualities that differentiate me from all other living beings. Further, these qualities can be nourished into the higher stages of self-actualization - and when these higher planes of the self are reached, and higher selves commune with one another to form communities, this is anarchy. Thus, identity is antithetical to the project of anarchy. Racism is an atrocity, I agree - not out of a moral sense of "duty" but out of a personal and instinctual repulsion - but we must understand that for racism to happen, individuals must be
racialized. They must be assigned a racial identity against their will, when they are individuals first and foremost. If I encounter an individual that would prefer me to speak a certain way, inasmuch as I find it egoistic to gain the person's respect, I will comply with their desire. If I don't find it egoistic, why would anyone expect me to comply? For "society"? For the "political ideal"? I am absolutely cynical about ideals and I hate society. I am concerned only with those individuals who are in pursuit of their highest selves, and who in so doing exit "society" and its moral strife completely, to wage open warfare against that society. Slave morality is absolutely antithetical to this project.
I do not expect you to agree, but I wanted to add nuance to my position so that it would not be misinterpreted. From some correspondences I have with other anarchists internationally, the positions I describe are much more common outside the US, in Argentina, Chile, Greece, Spain, and so on. The Conspiracy Cells of Fire, the Mexican ITS, and the international Federacion Anarquista International (FAI) are good examples and their writings can be found at nostate.325.net .
Lastly, consider the tactical benefit of slave morality to the Deep State, CIA, and other authoritarian organizations that aim to thwart cultures of resistance. These two articles do a good job at introducing this as a possibility without engaging with conspiracy thinking.
http://thephilosophicalsalon.com/th...ctual-labor-of-dismantling-the-cultural-left/ and
http://www.openculture.com/2015/12/simple-sabotage-field-manual.html are great examples
