Enviromental Insanity | Squat the Planet

Enviromental Insanity

I

IBRRHOBO

Guest
This thread may piss some folks off; I am pretty good at doing that and brush up all the time on it!

Yeah, so I get this pimple faced fuckstick kid from some tree hugging organization today on the phone trying to hawk his wares for 50 quid in the middle of dinner. I tried, politely, to tell him I really don't give a fuck about light bulbs as Dollar General has 'em 4 for a dollar and I had no need for his 7 dollar compact florescent lights (CFL). So this petulant motherf*cker starts in on how the South really needs to get with the program as we are a disaster area in terms of the environment. Had I been able to reach through the phone I would have shoved my hand down his throat and pulled his testicles out!

It's not so much that I am defending the South. First, when I am dead it's not going to matter a whole hell of a lot anyway. I DO have a problem with some fuckhead telling me what I MUST put into my home I OWN!

I *69'd his number, spoke with his manager and after a threat to call the FCC, as I am on the no call/fax list, they apologized and are now sending out a case of the fucking CFL's! See, I didn't want the fuckers anyway and now, thanks to the Save the Earth Foundation (forgot their name) I have yet more trash to deal with.

Well, I thought I better look into what this little fucking Al Gore was sending me and lo and behold here's an article dealing with it:

How much money does it take to screw in a compact fluorescent light bulb? About US$4.28 for the bulb and labour -- unless you break the bulb. Then you, like Brandy Bridges of Ellsworth, Maine, could be looking at a cost of about US$2,004.28, which doesn't include the costs of frayed nerves and risks to health.
Sound crazy? Perhaps no more than the stampede to ban the incandescent light bulb in favour of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs).
According to an April 12 article in The Ellsworth American, Bridges had the misfortune of breaking a CFL during installation in her daughter's bedroom: It dropped and shattered on the carpeted floor.
Aware that CFLs contain potentially hazardous substances, Bridges called her local Home Depot for advice. The store told her that the CFL contained mercury and that she should call the Poison Control hotline, which in turn directed her to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
The DEP sent a specialist to Bridges' house to test for mercury contamination. The specialist found mercury levels in the bedroom in excess of six times the state's "safe" level for mercury contamination of 300 billionths of a gram per cubic meter. The DEP specialist recommended that Bridges call an environmental cleanup firm, which reportedly gave her a "low-ball" estimate of US$2,000 to clean up the room. The room then was sealed off with plastic and Bridges began "gathering finances" to pay for the US$2,000 cleaning. Reportedly, her insurance company wouldn't cover the cleanup costs because mercury is a pollutant.
Given that the replacement of incandescent bulbs with CFLs in the average U.S. household is touted as saving as much as US$180 annually in energy costs -- and assuming that Bridges doesn't break any more CFLs -- it will take her more than 11 years to recoup the cleanup costs in the form of energy savings.
The potentially hazardous CFL is being pushed by companies such as Wal-Mart, which wants to sell 100 million CFLs at five times the cost of incandescent bulbs during 2007, and, surprisingly, environmentalists.
It's quite odd that environmentalists have embraced the CFL, which cannot now and will not in the foreseeable future be made without mercury. Given that there are about five billion light bulb sockets in North American households, we're looking at the possibility of creating billions of hazardous waste sites such as the Bridges' bedroom.
Usually, environmentalists want hazardous materials out of, not in, our homes. These are the same people who go berserk at the thought of mercury being emitted from power plants and the presence of mercury in seafood. Environmentalists have whipped up so much fear of mercury among the public that many local governments have even launched mercury thermometer exchange programs.
As the activist group Environmental Defense urges us to buy CFLs, it defines mercury on a separate part of its Web site as a "highly toxic heavy metal that can cause brain damage and learning disabilities in fetuses and children" and as "one of the most poisonous forms of pollution."
Greenpeace also recommends CFLs while simultaneously bemoaning contamination caused by a mercury-thermometer factory in India. But where are mercury-containing CFLs made? Not in the United States, under strict environmental regulation. CFLs are made in India and China, where environmental standards are virtually non-existent.
And let's not forget about the regulatory nightmare in the U.S. known as the Superfund law, the EPA regulatory program best known for requiring expensive but often needless cleanup of toxic waste sites, along with endless litigation over such cleanups.
We'll eventually be disposing billions and billions of CFL mercury bombs. Much of the mercury from discarded and/or broken CFLs is bound to make its way into the environment and give rise to Superfund liability, which in the past has needlessly disrupted many lives, cost tens of billions of dollars and sent many businesses into bankruptcy.
As each CFL contains five milligrams of mercury, at the Maine "safety" standard of 300 nanograms per cubic meter, it would take 16,667 cubic meters of soil to "safely" contain all the mercury in a single CFL. While CFL vendors and environmentalists tout the energy cost savings of CFLs, they conveniently omit the personal and societal costs of CFL disposal.
Not only are CFLs much more expensive than incandescent bulbs and emit light that many regard as inferior to incandescent bulbs, they pose a nightmare if they break and require special disposal procedures. Yet governments (egged on by environmentalists and the Wal-Marts of the world) are imposing on us such higher costs, denial of lighting choice, disposal hassles and breakage risks in the name of saving a few dollars every year on the electric bill? - Steven Milloy publishes JunkScience.com and CSRWatch.com. He is a junk-science expert and advocate of free enterprise, and an adjunct scholar at the Competitive Enterprise Institute..

This got me really thinking about all the environmental shit. Now, I don't agree with creating toxic waste dumps wherever or sending ships to India for dismantling so we don't deal with it here. I do believe that there have to be some pretty fine lines drawn though. For example, Congress' new initiative to get everyone into the hybrid cars. Well, I dredged this up:

Building a Toyota Prius causes more environmental damage than a Hummer because it is on the road for three times longer than a Prius. As already noted, the Prius is partly driven by a battery which contains nickel. The nickel is mined and smelted at a plant in Sudbury, Ontario. This plant has caused so much environmental damage to the surrounding environment that NASA has used the ‘dead zone’ around the plant to test moon rovers. The area around the plant is devoid of any life for miles.


The nickel produced by this disastrous plant is shipped via massive container ship to the largest nickel refinery in Europe. From there, the nickel hops over to China to produce ‘nickel foam.’ From there, it goes to Japan. Finally, the completed batteries are shipped to the United States, finalizing the around-the-world trip required to produce a single Prius battery.

So, I'm putting this in red as I'm pissed about things. See, where does it end? I mean at what point does my land and my life arbitrarily pass into other's hands? A light bulb here, a prius there, where does it end?

:club::club::club::club:this...' and '...start doing that... .'
 

veggieguy12

The Captain
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
732
Reaction score
138
Location
around the USA
I don't exactly know what to tell you, IBRR. The attempts to make improvements by lessening the impacts of our technologies upon the land we inhabit are often very flawed. Sometimes they do more harm than good, sometimes it's just "out of the frying pan into the fire".

I understand your frustrations and the notion of infringement upon your personal liberties. Of course you want a clean landbase and drinkable water and air without carcinogens. Who doesn't? The question or debate comes in answering how to get that, given the reality of all these things being "provided to us" by industry.

Me? I think the whole notion of working for consumer change - at the bottom of the long chain of resource extraction, processing/production, transportation, and retail sale - is flawed to begin with, and requires more time than we have.
Shit like styrofoam and plastic bags ought not be made in the first place, and if we end the production of this detrimental crap at its few sources, we won't need to pressure individuals to act en masse.
 

bote

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
665
Reaction score
165
Location
Baie des Chaleurs
I don't totally dismiss environmental harm reduction in engineering/ production, but you'll never see me applauding it either: I call bullshit on any suggestion that we can somehow buy our way out of this mess if only someone would sell us the right stuff, or if only we could figure out the right one to pick.
STOP BUYING SO MUCH SHIT ALREADY!!!!!

sorry IBRR, that's a little off topic, but I get pissed too, at the prospect of somebody calling me up to sell me anything at all...
 

macks

Ballsy Adventurer
Joined
Dec 3, 2007
Messages
484
Reaction score
35
Website
macksemil.wordpress.com
Good thread, I agree with ya. The problem is the industry not the product! Good caveat from the other thread about the radio towers too. Although the idea that a hummer is more enviornmentally friendly than another car makes me queasy, it's a good point.
 

dirtyfacedan

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2007
Messages
394
Reaction score
74
Location
Duncan, Canada
I agree. An old tungsten bulb is cheap and easy to make. CFL manufacturing costs are massive in comparison. The energy required to make one is considerable. It's all smoke and mirrors.
 

hartage

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
134
Reaction score
15
Location
southern cal
Just FYI. I buy those compact fluorescent lights for about the same price or cheaper than tungsten bulbs. .25 cents each 4 for a dollar. That's not a one time price either. Everyday price but I'm sure it takes advantage of some sort of rebate program. As a consumer though you don't see that part just a quarter each and sales tax. Limit is 40 cfl's per visit. $10 bux for 40 bulbs.
 

bote

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
665
Reaction score
165
Location
Baie des Chaleurs
IBRR, I had a job telemarketing one time long ago and it only lasted a couple days because knots would form in my stomach from all the lying and wormlike behaviour. Anyway, I called someone once and they told me to bugger off, the guy's exact words were in fact "I don't buy lightbulbs over the phone buddy" and I always thought that was kind of a weird expression, if it was an expression at all (I wasn't hawking bulbs or anything bulb related).

Hartage, I sincerely hope you had to go look that info up somewhere, but I also hope you didn't.
 

wokofshame

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
798
Reaction score
689
Location
novosivirsk, russia
Website
www.weather.gov
if i remember right CFL{s save you money over their lifespan if y{re paying for the elctricity becuase they use so much less. 40$ plus per bulb they say. Not that i beleive evrything i read (personally i think junkscience.com is exactly what it says, horseshit).
yes that nickel mine in sudbury i have seen it and the devastation is awesome if like me you love seeing that sort of thing. it{s just so black metal. check out palmerton PA for the lovely effects of zinc smelting. i guess smelting is all around bad shit.
 

hartage

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
134
Reaction score
15
Location
southern cal
Hartage, I sincerely hope you had to go look that info up somewhere, but I also hope you didn't.

Didn't look it up, I found them in a store up in LA (socal). Seen them months later same price been that way good 2 years now. Dunno the name of the place some oriental food store in westminster.
 

hartage

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
134
Reaction score
15
Location
southern cal
if i remember right CFL{s save you money over their lifespan if y{re paying for the elctricity becuase they use so much less. 40$ plus per bulb they say. Not that i beleive evrything i read (personally i think junkscience.com is exactly what it says, horseshit).
yes that nickel mine in sudbury i have seen it and the devastation is awesome if like me you love seeing that sort of thing. it{s just so black metal. check out palmerton PA for the lovely effects of zinc smelting. i guess smelting is all around bad shit.

Should be easy to verify. Regular bulbs are like 75watts. A comparable cfl puts out the same light but only draws 7 watts. Less than 10% of a standard bulb draw. All you would have to do is verify the wattage draw and you can calculate the rest.

So far the first cfl bulbs I bought 2 years ago are still going strong. Not bad for .25 cent jobbers.
 

finn

Playground Monitor
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
217
CFLs is pretty much a dead-end technology, there isn't much research going on in that area anymore, instead everyone is working on making LEDs brighter and cheaper (though who knows what costs that might entail). I don't get the environmentalists who insist on CFLs, given that it's not exactly a replacement for the incandescent bulb, you need to keep that light on for at least 15 minutes for it to be efficient... And then there's the mercury. There isn't a catch-all solution, and it does annoy me when some-know-it all wants to pretend that there is.

Of course I carry a flashlight everywhere, so who knows what damage I'm causing.
 
I

IBRRHOBO

Guest
i get a 404 error on lierre keith; the other article is rather circular; an ok read i guess. no to capitalism. hmnn, the coin of the realm has been here since recorded history. no activist(s) have ever changed that. so long as there is a product to be marketed, the populus who wants it will buy it. right or wrong, until you remove money (and i wager that will NEVER happen) it will never change.

funney footnote on the inconvenient truth your quoted article quoted. how much of a footprint was created to hussle al gore around the globe and market it? ever looked at his electric bill? i have..............
 
M

Mouse

Guest
hmm.. when I got kicked out of the apartment I was living in by the twat who's parents own the place, I managed to accidently drop one of those bulbs on the floor when I was packing, and I just left it there becasue I didn't give a shit.

I win! hopefully that stupid bitch gets mercury poisioning and dies.

but sadly my boyfriend is still living there becasue he has no other place to go.. I buy him a plastic suit or something. he's moving out, she's gonna be living in that place for years.




but I have to agree - the best way to be "green" is to STOP BUYING SHIT!

all these fuckers sporting "reduce reuse recycle" t shirts they got at the mall are fucking morons! it's completely going against the point the shirt is making.

i never knew about the harm these bulbs and those cars do. thanks for sharing!
 

bote

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
665
Reaction score
165
Location
Baie des Chaleurs
that derrick jensen article has been discussed at length on another thread entitled ¨your ecological footprint¨or something to that effect.


about ten years ago I remember my friend Mark pointing out that the whole ¨reduce, reuse, recycle¨ slogan would make a lot more sense with the addition of the word ¨refuse¨.
 

About us

  • Squat the Planet is the world's largest social network for misfit travelers. Join our community of do-it-yourself nomads and learn how to explore the world by any means necessary.

    More Info

Help us pay the bills!

Total amount
$10.00
Goal
$100.00

Latest Library Uploads