Ted Kaczynski was right….

wesleywilliam

Active member
Joined
Jan 3, 2023
Messages
42
Reaction score
26
Location
Hoffman estates, illinois
Hey
I want to share an essay many of you will agree with. It’s not pretty fyi. The author (Paul Kingsnorth) writes about how our society is heading toward collapse as the powerful believe that technology will solve all our problems; that to save our planet we must use technology even though tech is what brought here in the first place. (Progress trap- internal combustion engine, coal, oil, factories are why the climate is changing).

He’s not explicitly anarchist, but one of his proposed techniques to resist The Machine of “Progress” is too drop out of society. We need more slab cities. To go back to a simpler time. Go back to communities. So I guess he is kind of a primitive-anarchist. I feel my intuition has always felt this, but he’s the first person I’ve read to articulate it in such a precise way.

dark ecology — pk - https://www.paulkingsnorth.net/dark-ecology
 

born2raizehell

owen mooney
Joined
Dec 28, 2021
Messages
67
Reaction score
58
Location
somerville, massachusetts, usa
it says to throw away your smartphone, it reminds me of how I used a flip phone for the longest time because I didnt want the new technology. I still had a flip phone in 2016... but then I got this phone and I use it for everything. if anybody should die in the apocalypse its rich people who work for all the advanced tech shit that doesnt improve anybodys life and just furthers the agenda of their corporation... not saying you should blow them up but I can imagine many would starve to death in a real apocalypse scenario! anyway my favorite type of phone still would probably be the side flip phone with the keyboard. those things were solid!!!
 

The Toecutter

The Patron Saint of Filth
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
173
Reaction score
273
Location
Everywhere and nowhere
He’s not explicitly anarchist, but one of his proposed techniques to resist The Machine of “Progress” is too drop out of society.

This has been a goal of mine. It takes a certain baseline of accumulated wealth to even come halfway towards doing this now days, at least if you want to be able to be self reliant. I'm working on it, but not there yet, not even close in fact, but I can see a way toward it.

What is currently called "society" is one highly integrated, systematic grift(paraphrasing Dmitry Orlov). It has been engineered to extract from those who labor for a living, and funnel the surplus value upward to an entrenched aristocracy. Meanwhile, most of the population has been so thoroughly brainwashed that they believe they live in a democracy where their actions have influence upon the major decisions made, not realizing that they in fact live in a corporate-run dictatorship where their lives are micromanaged.

While I agree with Mr. Kaczynski's thesis and points, I'm not exactly anti-technology either as he was, logically inconsistent a position as this may be. What I see to be the problem is FORCED reliance upon technology. The sort of life that Kaczynski has attempted to live has been functionally outlawed, as he watched the world slowly mutate into one giant open-air prison, driven by civilization's reliance upon technology as well as said technology being used as a means of extraction and social control. Technology could instead be a tool of human ascension, if only people controlled it and not the other way around. Kaczynski is probably correct in his assessment that this is impossible, but I posit the problem isn't technology, it is the existence of aristocracy itself along with all of the rules said aristocracy has imposed upon the rest of humanity, presumably for the good of humanity, but in actuality, to its detriment and even possible future extinction.

A lot of people like to dismiss Kaczynski simply because he is a murderer, and will see nothing else of him. These same people will then not object to their tax dollars being sent to mass murderers that they supposedly "voted" for, mass murderers who not only dwarf Kaczynski's kill count, but who have failed to do anything at all with their lives to advance the human condition. Kaczynski, OTOH, has advanced the human condition with his writings and insight. Guess who is in prison, and guess who continues industrial-scale slaughter of people around the globe with impunity while the planet's biosphere faces collapse?
 

wesleywilliam

Active member
Joined
Jan 3, 2023
Messages
42
Reaction score
26
Location
Hoffman estates, illinois
While I agree with Mr. Kaczynski's thesis and points, I'm not exactly anti-technology either as he was, logically inconsistent a position as this may be. What I see to be the problem is FORCED reliance upon technology. The sort of life that Kaczynski has attempted to live has been functionally outlawed, as he watched the world slowly mutate into one giant open-air prison, driven by civilization's reliance upon technology as well as said technology being used as a means of extraction and social control. Technology could instead be a tool of human ascension, if only people controlled it and not the other way around. Kaczynski is probably correct in his assessment that this is impossible, but I posit the problem isn't technology, it is the existence of aristocracy itself along with all of the rules said aristocracy has imposed upon the rest of humanity, presumably for the good of humanity, but in actuality, to its detriment and even possible future extinction.
Kingsnorth in his essay I linked he talks about the “progress trap”. No matter who’s in control, we will become reliant on the use of tech itself, which will bring about unexpected consequences. Hunter gatherers got so good at hunting there wasn’t enough left to support the growing population. So then they had to farm, which can support very large populations; but the whims of Mother Nature making a drought, sending in locus, making the weather too cold, too hot will cause a famine.

The aristocrats serve The Machine of Progress. They believe technological progress is good in itself, that it’s the highest value, their god pretty much. That’s what the transhumanist have been saying, that we as humans are only a step in evolution towards self aware A.I.

When you say tech could be used towards ascension what do you mean by that? Just a better easier life? Or like ascension in getting crazy high tech robot arms and l gs and living for 1000 years?

IMO technology isn’t either bad or good, it’s how it’s used. What do those in control of it value?
 

wesleywilliam

Active member
Joined
Jan 3, 2023
Messages
42
Reaction score
26
Location
Hoffman estates, illinois
it says to throw away your smartphone, it reminds me of how I used a flip phone for the longest time because I didnt want the new technology. I still had a flip phone in 2016... but then I got this phone and I use it for everything. if anybody should die in the apocalypse its rich people who work for all the advanced tech shit that doesnt improve anybodys life and just furthers the agenda of their corporation... not saying you should blow them up but I can imagine many would starve to death in a real apocalypse scenario! anyway my favorite type of phone still would probably be the side flip phone with the keyboard. those things were solid!!!

Haha yeah I remember having a flip phone too, I was the last guy i knew that got a smart phone!
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Toecutter

The Toecutter

The Patron Saint of Filth
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
173
Reaction score
273
Location
Everywhere and nowhere
Kingsnorth in his essay I linked he talks about the “progress trap”. No matter who’s in control, we will become reliant on the use of tech itself, which will bring about unexpected consequences. Hunter gatherers got so good at hunting there wasn’t enough left to support the growing population. So then they had to farm, which can support very large populations; but the whims of Mother Nature making a drought, sending in locus, making the weather too cold, too hot will cause a famine.

The aristocrats serve The Machine of Progress. They believe technological progress is good in itself, that it’s the highest value, their god pretty much. That’s what the transhumanist have been saying, that we as humans are only a step in evolution towards self aware A.I.

When you say tech could be used towards ascension what do you mean by that? Just a better easier life? Or like ascension in getting crazy high tech robot arms and l gs and living for 1000 years?

IMO technology isn’t either bad or good, it’s how it’s used. What do those in control of it value?

Part of the issue that makes progress a trap is that infinite growth on a planet of finite resources is not possible. While ancient hunter-gather societies can be forgiven for not understanding concepts like exponential growth and resource limits, humanity knows better today. If we as a species went to a steady state economy and stopped destroying the last remnants of the natural world in the pursuit of unlimited growth, then not nearly as many traps would be set.

The problem is that the major decision makers never have enough wealth, and it has become such a sickness that with as much abundance as there is in the world, most people still toil and struggle daily and massive wars are fought for resources, all because the abundance is not shared. Aristocracy seeks to maintain a paradigm of constant growth in order to retain their power and control over the rest of humanity, and they will seek to do so no matter the expense to humanity or the planet, and no matter what everyone else wants. This sickness has gotten to the point where human interactions, personal information, biometrics, even human thoughts are being monetized because everything else has been conquered and extracted. New novel ways of exploiting and extracting from human beings keep being invented in pursuit of more for the aristocracy, at the expense of human autonomy. Further, by controlling access to the surplus and hoarding it, the aristocracy can continue to extract from and control everyone else, and they aren't ever going to peacefully give that up. The aristocracy sees themselves as being above their own humanity, hence their push toward transhumanism, and in doing so, actually have willingly forfeited their humanity in exchange for a lesser state of being.

Transhumanism would spell the death knell for humanity, by definition, and is to be fought against at all costs. Kaczynski saw this coming decades ahead of his time, even if perhaps he didn't think industrial civilization would hold out long enough for its initial stages to manifest as they have today.

When I say tech can be used for human ascension, I mean in the sense that it can be used for people to become aware of how the world they live in has been shaped by a small group of self-serving people, perhaps allow the masses of humanity to overthrow these people, and eventually allow everyone to attain a high living standard with minimal toil with a resource footprint that is in balance with what the biosphere can provide, being the double-edges sword that technology is. Will that happen? Probably not. Theoretically, it could. The alternative is that Theodore's predictions for industrial civilization come to pass, and possibly with it, human extinction. If the transhumanists win out, the latter is assured. Finding ways to balance our use of tech with concern for the limitations of the natural world is the middle ground we so desperately need as a species, and there is no room there for a selfish few to hoard most of the Earth's bounty for themselves, as billions of mouths to feed and house is already a more-than Herculean task for the planet. The planet will do just fine without us.

Haha yeah I remember having a flip phone too, I was the last guy i knew that got a smart phone!

I still have a $10 flip phone to use for my job. If my employment didn't require it, I'd probably ditch it.
 
Last edited:

Matt Derrick

Retired Wanderer
Staff member
Joined
Aug 4, 2006
Messages
10,547
Reaction score
13,830
Location
Portland, OR
Website
youtube.com
Am I the only person here that thinks kaczynski wasn't nearly the folk hero people make him out to be?

I'm pretty pro technology but very anti-capitalism.
 

wesleywilliam

Active member
Joined
Jan 3, 2023
Messages
42
Reaction score
26
Location
Hoffman estates, illinois
Am I the only person here that thinks kaczynski wasn't nearly the folk hero people make him out to be?

I'm pretty pro technology but very anti-capitalism
Have you read his manifesto? I don’t 100% agree with his thoughts, but I do think he was correct in some ways. He saw that if we keeping using tech the way we are now we will get very very dependent on it’s super-complex infrastructure- which itself is very fragile- and therefore there will be an end-of-the-known-world level collapse because of that dependence and fragility
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Big George W

The Toecutter

The Patron Saint of Filth
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
173
Reaction score
273
Location
Everywhere and nowhere

DirtNap

Chef-Squatch exists and hes me
Joined
Feb 6, 2023
Messages
5
Reaction score
23
Location
Mt Snow Resort VT
Am I the only person here that thinks kaczynski wasn't nearly the folk hero people make him out to be?

I'm pretty pro technology but very anti-capitalism.

i agree 100%

technology good because i dont want to die from polio.

capitalism bad because they patented the vaccine for polio.

And indiscriminate mail bombing are, i wanna say, not great.
 

sevedemanos

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 29, 2021
Messages
213
Reaction score
214
Location
pnw
im pretty sure its too late. we — or what we think of “we” rn — are totally fucked.

i used to spend entire days reading / ordering hard to find books at the uw in seattle but honestly never heard of him. googling to do sometime ig
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big George W

roughdraft

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
1,283
Reaction score
1,489
Location
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
seems like the guy had a lot of super ideas and was able to execute a lot in his life (no pun intended) but it was still far from sufficient relative to his pain.

my understanding is that the last straw was when he figured out hangin out by himself in the bush actually sucked, as it did when people started building up closer to his cabin, and going further back when he was in his professorship, etc.....

he ultimately gave in to his wrath and lashed out against the world he was so aware of the problems in, but it was his own problems that got him the most. otherwise, why would he have not just stayed put and not put himself in a position to be inevitably targeted?

very relatable story to be honest when it comes to what's within one's control and how to react, during the long-haul

well there really isn't much i can do about what other people do, why torture myself over something that i had no say in? and cannot change?

it took me a long time to get that thought straight in my head
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Big George W

wesleywilliam

Active member
Joined
Jan 3, 2023
Messages
42
Reaction score
26
Location
Hoffman estates, illinois

wesleywilliam

Active member
Joined
Jan 3, 2023
Messages
42
Reaction score
26
Location
Hoffman estates, illinois
i agree 100%

technology good because i dont want to die from polio.

capitalism bad because they patented the vaccine for polio.

And indiscriminate mail bombing are, i wanna say, not great.
First of all yes, Bombing people is bad lol

But our relationship with technology is not that simple. Obviously technology has awesome benefits, but awesome consequences from the way we use it.
 

wesleywilliam

Active member
Joined
Jan 3, 2023
Messages
42
Reaction score
26
Location
Hoffman estates, illinois
im pretty sure its too late. we — or what we think of “we” rn — are totally fucked.

i used to spend entire days reading / ordering hard to find books at the uw in seattle but honestly never heard of him. googling to do sometime ig

You should read that essay i linked if you haven't already. The author, paul kingsnorth, gives a very unique perspective on the problem. In his most recent essay on substack he talks about how the world as we know it is pretty much on the way towards collapse and the best way to respond.

In my opinion the wisest thing to do is to try to detach oneself as much as possible from society. This isn't even being all hippie-dippie. Nah we are very very comfortable and cozy and cared for nowadays. Things are gonna get rough, so get ready
 

laughingman

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2022
Messages
112
Reaction score
225
Location
Williamsburg PA
Website
www.youtube.com
Am I the only person here that thinks kaczynski wasn't nearly the folk hero people make him out to be?

I'm pretty pro technology but very anti-capitalism.

Ive got to agree with the other Matt on this one. I don't think our problem is technology. Its people using that tech to destroy and conqueror and enslave others. Its a bit over simplistic to state that the invention of this that or the other was fundamentally harmful. Tech, one could argue, is any system by which humans act there will on there surroundings. hunter gatherers used tech long before the invention of agriculture. Could we argue that early humanity was enslaved by there use of the bow or atlatl? That the first human who invented shoes or clothes was harmed as a result? I'm not here saying that all tech is good or that it will swoop in and solve all our problems. But it does seam like a straw-man for the real issue, a system which turns human lives and the very biosphere that sustains humanity into a devalued commodity. A system that uses tech, and anything else it can, to capitalize and monetize the suffering and death of us all.


There also might be something to said about the irony of debating the evils of tech or capitalism on an online forum which only exists because of tech and capitalism. Kind of like the irony of protesting tech with explosives which fundamentally depend on tech. So who's to say what less clouded eyes might think about all this. Given that these forces arueably allow us all to live to an extent.
 

Beegod Santana

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
956
Reaction score
1,432
Location
The woods
Ted really wasn't "right" about much. Even he admitted that his actions were out of spite and revenge and not necessarily in a realistic pursuit of taking down the system. The stuff he was right about was all stuff easily observed by most anyone with eyes. Industry threatens the environment, we've traded personal freedoms for reduced infant mortality, ect... He also had a weird definition of being anti-tech. Like, advanced wood working, saw mills and gun powder is fine, but telephones and bulldozers bad I guess?
 

sevedemanos

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 29, 2021
Messages
213
Reaction score
214
Location
pnw
You should read that essay i linked if you haven't already. The author, paul kingsnorth, gives a very unique perspective on the problem. In his most recent essay on substack he talks about how the world as we know it is pretty much on the way towards collapse and the best way to respond.

In my opinion the wisest thing to do is to try to detach oneself as much as possible from society. This isn't even being all hippie-dippie. Nah we are very very comfortable and cozy and cared for nowadays. Things are gonna get rough, so get ready

havent things always been rough? half my familys dead and seems to me 9 in 10 people these days are friggin nuts. that or entirely incompetent / ignorant.

also, wasnt ted k a terrorist? seems he took random peoples lives. thats kind of a downer :(
 

About us

  • Squat the Planet is the world's largest social network for misfit travelers. Join our community of do-it-yourself nomads and learn how to explore the world by any means necessary.

    More Info

Latest Library Uploads