Byron, hope yer well!!
yeah.. the main thing is mechanical worthiness, for sure..
i'm playing the adversary, to some extent, but i've done a lot of road living, too..
i'm older, so i can't say if it was as hard as some of the youngn's, now, & i wind up housed up for a few months at a time as i spread my ass all over wherever it goes, but.. mechanical issues aside..
i really have to wonder if a standard size van is a good choice, just space-wise, if it's intended to be a dedicated dwelling... i mean, i have my vandura & it's fine for one person, but storage is always a major issue..
throw in a decent tool set, some reasonable spare parts, 5 gallons of fuel, a 5 gallon container of water, a food bin & some books or electronic crap, & shit gets clogged up *fast*..
i mean, storage up top, whether a carrier or rack or high-top cabinets is pretty well much standard for all long term rigs.. i agree, though, fer sure, though, that roof leaks absolutely, positively suck, no matter how manageable they are..
as much as the mechanical aspects are paramount (what good is a 2003 high top, if it's shittily engineered?), and as much as the 1986 design means user friendly maintenance, & as much as it may be a bird in the hand, i can't really say that it might not be wise to keep shopping around..
i bought my rig specifically for the power train, and as beautifull as she's been, if i i keep her & get the chance? i'm ripping her roof off & giving myself some additional enclosed space..
i mean, unless you have *just* a backpack, good basic tools & a small stove & are in a wagon or a sedan, an extended van is the very next step that should be taken, if possible, before migrating to a full RV..
a good deal is a good deal (say $1,200 for this rig, if she's been well kept & fluids maintained throughout her 130,000 mile life, though i wouldn't touch her for more than $500 at 230K) but if there's *time* to look around, and if the present money can be kept from being burned by the daily necessities of existence, i personally would keep shopping around..
an extended van vs. a standard van is easily worth +/- $400 in repairs, if they effectively cost the same..
& 400 doesn't fix much, but it can fix some basic non-fatal issues...
also, the conversion on this van is limited..
it's a great *camping* vehicle, or *utility* vehicle or even a great traveling / homie on the road vehicle (which i guess is what i am, basically), but it is *not* a good "this will be my home for 5 years" kind of rig..
As far as i know, that was one of the specs Matt had mentioned, so if a full time house-up on wheels is a requirement, the thing to do is put the money ****away****... like bury it in the desert or something & get another $500 together, and look around again.. at $1700 - $2000 (pretty well much the magic number) there are *scores* of deals to be had, & it's always better to be able to pick what you want to jump at, than to jump just because it looks good..
but.. i do agree, if time is a super critical element, & if this rig has only 130K on her, & if she doesn't seriously rattle, jolt or whine in the power train & isn't showing evidence of serious bleeding, she's a Buy, at $1,200 or less.. but not more than that, and $1,000 would be better..
if she's 230K, which is actually about *half* of what a 40 year old vehicle should have, she shouldn't even be considered.. i suspect, actually, that it's closer to 230K than 130, unless the seller is the original owner with documentation, rather than just the friend of a friend..
i mean, the person selling it could be the 3rd owner (or more), so who knows what's been lost in translation?
a 40 year old vehicle will average closer to 330K, assuming the last 15 years of it's like have seen only 8,000 miles of usage, each.
at 130K, she should be pretty fucking close to pristine, underneath & in the engine compartment..
the real tell may be the brake lines.. if those fuckers are seriously corroded anywhere along their run, for more than about 12", & show other corrosion spots, *or have been replaced* she has been **been on the road for *much* more than 130K**.. i don't mean just surface rust that you can scrape to grey metail with your finger nail, but... uhmm.. crusty.. ; )
i mean, if she was rigged out as a camper early, well.. maybe 130K is right.. lots & lots & lots of older RVs & RV camper vans come in at *under 100K*, and some date from the 70's, but that's because they were never intended for commercial or daily driving..
i mean, if she *has* 130K?
it really is fucking sweet..
me?
i'd be nervous as all fuck, unless until i could check out the clear majority of each point that mentioned so far, and that each point accessible passed the inspection *well*..
i mean, if she's clean & has *some* kind of documet, dating from about year 2005 that shows a service record (repair or oil change) with the odometer at under 99,000 miles, then yer golden.. def pick her up, based upon trust, if that's what yer comfortable with.
even a service record from 2000 would be to far away..
& dig this:
*anyone* who loves their vehicles enough to drive them gently over 4 fucking decades, to the point of having only 130K ***WILL***.. i repeat ***WILL*** have service records.
***WILL***
i'm not being a prick, repeating that, but unless the dog ate them, or there was a house fire, or they went up over the rainbow with dorthy, they *will* exist...
if they *don't*.. well.. i won't say yer being scammed, but *somebody* in the chain of title did *not* do what most owners of a classic, low mileage vehicle would.
anyways..
i'm done ranting at you, Matt..
sorry..
she def looks sweet, but if you *can* get her?
be carefull.. def make sure she's dry & clean..
if she is, & if you do get her, you'll do really, really well..
we'll see you eventually..
c