Sweet rig!!
Def a good ride..
I've heard various opinions on the tire & rain issue.. I've never seen undue wear, but that may have to do with the knurling on the drive roller.. Dunno..
The main thing that appeals to me with the friction drive is the compactness & relative simplicity.
Chain & belt drives def have more direct torque, & maybe if you go up above 50 cc you'd see a definite increase in tire wear.
Hillbilly's post is the first I've read that indicates any portability..
My ignorance on the matter, fer sure, & if tires are truly a problem, not worth it.
I don't recall the west coast statutes, & I don't know what MX is like, but if you can get away with an 80 cc motor, the power is def worth it.
Friction drive, in general, is best used for power assist..
They do, generally, have a centrifugal clutch, which although simple, is an additional system.
If I were riding with just myself & no more than about 30 pounds or gear, & satisfied with 25 or 30 mph, I think I'd go friction, especially if the bike is a hard tail.
Anything more, or for higher speeds, chain drive..
One thing I would note on your bike, Hillbilly, is that since it's a hard tail, off roading might be a bit rough, on rocky terrain..
The bike looks like a tank, though, & I suspect there's no structural issues you'll ever have to worry about..
Looks like you have a good spring mounted seat, too..
Longest ride I ever did was 4 days through the mountains of Tennessee, years ago..
when i was dumb & in love..
If I knew then, I'd have just dumped the love & concentrated on learning how to travel on s bike ; )
Hopefully I'll see you down there.. We can make a run for parts or whatnot : )