P
Pheonix
Guest
if you noticed in some of the other threads I don't believe the Occupy movement really has the best interest of the poorest 5%, I believe the movement to have the interest of the middle class at heart.
I would like to start a movement in CA to help those who are homeless. for awhile now I've been planning on using adverse possession to squat a farmhouse with land for goats. but I know that adverse possession rarely goes through all the way to title transfer. but we don't have to actually gain title to use it as a form of protest.
my plan is to find and hire a real estate lawyer to file all required paperwork so we have to actually be evicted by the banks that own the property. fighting the eviction will cause the banks to spend even more money. another option is "cash for keys" where the bank will pay the tenants to leave the house and hand over the keys.
in order to make this the most effective we need to target the most expensive property the bank owns. that way they can't sell it and are bleeding money from the court cost and the eviction cost.
adverse possession in CA requires you to pay the property taxes that's why I stoped looking at Malibu mansions and started looking for a farm. also I would be happier on a farm then a mansion. but since we won't be trying to take over the property we don't have to pay the property tax (and if the banks don't pay the taxes then the government takes the property and the bank will be out even more money. (so I'd let the banks worry about the taxes)
I wish more people knew about adverse possession since everyone is losing their homes and the banks are benefiting from other people's misery. I think adverse possession is a good way for the people losing their homes to fight back against the banks. I want to help those new homeless people that are down on their luck and help them find a new home to squat. I don't want everyone to do this out of protest, some people need to do this out of necessity. those people that want to end up owning their squat will have to pay taxes and make improvements on the home. there are other requirements but these 2 are the most expensive.
what I'm proposing is simular to Homes not Jails based out of SF but geared more towards a protest but we will help those looking for a home as well.
the objectives of my mission is to bring adverse possession out of it's secret closet buried in real estate legal mumbo jumbo, and let everyone know how they can use this law to their advantage. I believe the banks aren't really concerned with the Occupy movement right now since what the movement is doing doesn't really affect their daily business much, but my plan affects the banks were it hurts (in the wallet) applying a little bit more pressure. I would like to work with the Occupy movement to bring more unity between poor and middle-class.
adverse possession varies from state to state that's why I'm concentrating on CA, but every state has adverse possession and it's something that the real estate tycoons and the banks want striken from the books cause they know the potentual that law has to destroy the empire they built for themselves.
I would like to start a movement in CA to help those who are homeless. for awhile now I've been planning on using adverse possession to squat a farmhouse with land for goats. but I know that adverse possession rarely goes through all the way to title transfer. but we don't have to actually gain title to use it as a form of protest.
my plan is to find and hire a real estate lawyer to file all required paperwork so we have to actually be evicted by the banks that own the property. fighting the eviction will cause the banks to spend even more money. another option is "cash for keys" where the bank will pay the tenants to leave the house and hand over the keys.
in order to make this the most effective we need to target the most expensive property the bank owns. that way they can't sell it and are bleeding money from the court cost and the eviction cost.
adverse possession in CA requires you to pay the property taxes that's why I stoped looking at Malibu mansions and started looking for a farm. also I would be happier on a farm then a mansion. but since we won't be trying to take over the property we don't have to pay the property tax (and if the banks don't pay the taxes then the government takes the property and the bank will be out even more money. (so I'd let the banks worry about the taxes)
I wish more people knew about adverse possession since everyone is losing their homes and the banks are benefiting from other people's misery. I think adverse possession is a good way for the people losing their homes to fight back against the banks. I want to help those new homeless people that are down on their luck and help them find a new home to squat. I don't want everyone to do this out of protest, some people need to do this out of necessity. those people that want to end up owning their squat will have to pay taxes and make improvements on the home. there are other requirements but these 2 are the most expensive.
what I'm proposing is simular to Homes not Jails based out of SF but geared more towards a protest but we will help those looking for a home as well.
the objectives of my mission is to bring adverse possession out of it's secret closet buried in real estate legal mumbo jumbo, and let everyone know how they can use this law to their advantage. I believe the banks aren't really concerned with the Occupy movement right now since what the movement is doing doesn't really affect their daily business much, but my plan affects the banks were it hurts (in the wallet) applying a little bit more pressure. I would like to work with the Occupy movement to bring more unity between poor and middle-class.
adverse possession varies from state to state that's why I'm concentrating on CA, but every state has adverse possession and it's something that the real estate tycoons and the banks want striken from the books cause they know the potentual that law has to destroy the empire they built for themselves.