News & Blogs It's official... Columbia SC bans homeless

thapoet

Mr. Grizzly Bear bait
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
218
Reaction score
190
Location
not there
Under Runyan’s “Emergency Homeless Response” plan, homeless-looking people in the city’s 36-block downtown district will be asked by police to move to a shelter on the outskirts of the Columbia. If a person refuses, they could be arrested on a range of public nuisance laws.

Once at the shelter, the only way to leave is by reserving a shuttle ride. To make sure the homeless don’t return, a police officer will be stationed on the road leading to the downtown district to keep the homeless away.



http://drudgegae.iavian.net/r?hop=h...ry/23280900/city-makes-being-homeless-illegal
 

iSTEVEi

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 24, 2012
Messages
79
Reaction score
39
Location
Wolverhampton
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...essnes-columbia-south-carolina_n_3825052.html

A Southern city’s decision to criminalize homelessness has outraged a number of groups, including the police force that’s expected to implement it.
In a unanimous vote on Aug. 13, council members in Columbia, South Carolina decided that homeless people would no longer be allowed to loiter, sleep or eat on the area’s Downtown streets and would have the choice to either go to a remote shelter, or get arrested, an extreme plan that would require designated police officers to carry out. But the police chief and city manager are pushing back against the measure and are saying that they never agreed to the terms of the report, according to The State.
“Homelessness is not a crime,” Interim Police Chief Ruben Santiago told The State. “I’ve got to have the legal right (to question or take anyone into custody). We can’t just take people to somewhere they don’t want to go. I can’t do that. I won’t do that.”
Santiago and City manager Teresa Wilson said they did not authorize dispensing more cops to enforce what is outlined in the “Emergency Homeless Response” report.
The temporary solution, according to the report, is to transport any homeless person to a shelter that accommodates 240 clients, a facility that will also be home to recently released inmates. Additional police will be responsible for rounding up homeless people on the street and sending them to the shelter. Once the homeless occupants arrive, they will not be permitted to leave the premises without permission, and a police officer will be stationed nearby to make sure of it.
However, Councilman Cameron Runyan, the man behind the homelessness plan, says that everyone was in agreement on the night of the vote, a matter that will be cleared up only once the minutes are released during the next meeting in September.
Runyan also insists that his plan isn’t a “crackdown,” but rather a roadmap to eliminating the issue in the long-term and to improving businesses that he thinks are suffering because of the city’s homelessness issue.
"We have to understand that the only cure for poverty is commerce," Runyan told WISTV after the vote. "That is the only true response to poverty, to get people out of poverty. So if poverty is left unchecked, it will destroy commerce. So we've got to protect commerce to have a response to poverty."
But advocates have found a number of holes in Runyan’s plan, which includes the fact that the shelter the city would be shuttling the homeless people to can’t accommodate the estimated 1,621 people living on the streets of Columbia and the surrounding area.
The National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty also pointed out in a 2011 report that providing adequate shelter is far cheaper that criminalizing homelessness.
Cost studies in 13 cities and states revealed that, on average, cities spend $87 per day to jail a person, and $28 per day for shelter.
But Santiago hasn’t given up on protesting the plan and will submit suggestions to the city manager next week.
“I think there are some misconceptions out there that police are going to go out there and scoop up the homeless,” Santiago told The State. “We want to make sure we’re doing things the legal, proper way.”
 

iamwhatiam

Burrito fund contributor
StP Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
1,073
Reaction score
2,035
Location
Foothills of the Cascades, western WA
wait a minute, i thought we lived in a free country? who does this runyan guy think he is and does he actually believe his plan will work? pfft i'd like to ask him if he's ever stayed in a shelter before in his life. probably not. most of them are disgusting not to mention some of the people you have to deal with.
 

Beegod Santana

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
962
Reaction score
1,448
Location
The woods
The cop guy said it best, "I’ve got to have the legal right (to question or take anyone into custody). We can’t just take people to somewhere they don’t want to go." He absolutely right too. This has become a national story at this point, no one's gonna wanna be the one who goes down for illegally detaining hundreds of people. Even in SC this shit don't fly. Actually enforcing this policy would leave Columbia open to all sorts of law suits and possible federal intervention. A few dick bag cops out there pull shit like this, but it can't be open public policy just yet, thankfully.

Still, just the fact that this is even happening is fucked.
 

About us

  • Squat the Planet is the world's largest social network for misfit travelers. Join our community of do-it-yourself nomads and learn how to explore the world by any means necessary.

    More Info

Latest Library Uploads