Have you guys caught wind of this yet?
Absolutely horrific. I don't know how we got here as a country but something has to change.
Absolutely horrific. I don't know how we got here as a country but something has to change.
Have you guys caught wind of this yet?
Absolutely horrific. I don't know how we got here as a country but something has to change.
I think it's hard to nail down, and hard to fix, because we've got a lot of stuff all kind of combining into the perfect police storm. Like how police unions protect most police from any real consequences of their actions, and how an increasing amount of police are military veterans (no offense) , and how police are increasingly using military hardware, and how police are so glorified in american culture that in many peoples' eyes they can do no wrong, and the rise of gun obsession, and lack of mandated oversight (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes,), and lack of education on the judicial system.Absolutely horrific. I don't know how we got here as a country but something has to change.
I think that the only way to fix it is to take an extreme about-face, disarm police
They don't need to carry weapons to have access to weapons. In many countries the police carry no firearms on their person, and they aren't just indiscriminately slaughtered by methed-out homebums with illegal weaponryIf we do take the route of disarming police, who's going to protect non-gun owners. Some maniac with a gun could take down countless police officers, non-violent resolution is really fucking hard when you're dealing with a deranged school shooter, or some insane homebum high on copious amounts of meth with some illegally bought rifle.
They don't need to carry weapons to have access to weapons. In many countries the police carry no firearms on their person, and they aren't just indiscriminately slaughtered by methed-out homebums with illegal weaponry
And then you're risking the lives of civilians to protect the cop who volunteered to place themselves in the line of duty to protect civilians. If they have weapons, the situation is inherently more likely to escalate. Weapons make people feel threatened, and when people feel threatened, we know that fight or flight kicks in. The cop is feeling threatened and has something to fight with, the person they're dealing with is feeling threatened because that weapon is an implicit threat that says "if you don't do what I say I can hurt you". Just by giving them weapons to carry around you're saying "we're going to sacrifice a certain amount of innocent lives to protect the lives of these officers." Training helps, but it'll only lower the cost, not eliminate it. It's either officers falling in the line of duty, or civilians, and just by arming police it's even possible that we're increasing the numbers of both (I don't claim to have any research to back up that assumption).That situation could be prevented if the cop had effective weaponry on himself and was trained properly on how and when to use it. Other units arrive way after the perp has already done damage.
And then you're risking the lives of civilians to protect the cop who volunteered to place themselves in the line of duty to protect civilians.
Weapons make people feel threatened, and when people feel threatened, we know that fight or flight kicks in.
Just by giving them weapons to carry around you're saying "we're going to sacrifice a certain amount of innocent lives to protect the lives of these officers."
I understand some of them are ex-military. That's not an excuse.
Most of the fascists that show behavior like this have never been in the millitary, and it shows.
The best cops ive ever known were usually vets, because they have the training, and the ability to keep a cool head.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.