for lack of better words.If you want to start something a couple well targeted assassinations would do the trick.
we have a whole nation conditioned to the point that if ANYONE goes against our government, they are a terrorist, you would be slandered on Fox news and every major corporate outlet as an enemy and alot of the nation would rise up against you, in a revolution, you always need the support of the people(Morale, food/shelter, medicine etc) and if the media spreads lies about you, the nation will listen and also try to destroy you.
I have 3 problems with Armed Insurrection:
1. We'd lose.
2. We'd fucking lose.
3. It creates a situation of mutual self defense between the revolutionaries and the soldiers of the
regime
Air power and intelligence plays a huge role in modern war. We have no drones, planes, choppers or areal recon. It doesn't matter how many fighters we have, we'd lose to resources and supplies.
The other problem I have is moral. Mutual self defense is a situation where opposing forces are shooting at each-other out of self-preservation. The soldier has nothing against the revolutionary, but is being shot at by the revolutionary. The revolutionary has nothing against the soldier, but is being made to shoot him because he is protecting his oppressor.
Exactly Washington didn't start the revolution, a bunch of tea hating people in Boston did.unlike most people here, im not going to say DON'T do it, but rather just change your tactics. you can't win a war like that here currently, so just switch to grass roots organization and take it from the ground level up. you can make a hell of a lot more change in your community than you can with a big demonstration in washington d.c. that's where the revolution begins.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.