thisisme
Well-known member
all i was trying to say is as long as someone treats others with respect and understanding its irrelevant whether or not they fit under the category of privileged. Everyone wants to be treated with dignity and respect. Maybe its just because it seems like a no brainer to me, but i dont think a 20 page "checklist" for the cisgendered is really necessary. Its a bit insulting. of course i also understand that unforturnately not everyone is empathetic and respectful, otherwise this wouldnt be an issue in the first place, so in that regard it would be necessary for certain individuals. What bothers me is the assumption that because i fit into the cisgendered category i automatically "dont get it" and must read an extremely long checklist that basically boils down to everyone is human and should be treated with diginity and respect no matter who they are. i said some less than kind words to pip, not because this person is transgendered but because of the lack of respect and ignorant assumptions being directed at me, the same thing they seemed to be complaining about, simply because i agreed that the checklist seemed obnoxious. i do agree i couldve have been more tactful on my response to this, but was simply trying to make the point that pip was being hypocritical. My responses were meant more fecitiously than anything. i agree with the fact that way too much time and energy is spent on labels and categorizing everyone, something which was created with the intent to break down those barriers only seems to lead to more barriers being created in the end. i dont know if this sounds repetitive or even makes any damn sense but thats my last two cents for this topic.