Nobody is talking about hurting their dogs? At most people have said they should do some jail time and that then brings into question what will happen to their dogs but nobody is saying hurt their dogs as far as I can tell.
The initial framing of the situation as though they did has created a disproportionate response."
Would any of you give a shit if it was a raccoon?"
Also, they've already been arrested and charged, they're probably gonna do some time, their dogs are likely going to the pound, and they are gonna be called out and shunned (hopefully). What more do you want?"
So what I'm saying is that this whole justice-avenger fantasy/cop calling bandwagon is kind of unnecessary, and it may have been better for folx to just be like "oh those kids that cut up a dead cat on Instagram? Fuck them, they're not welcome in my scene."
Meanwhile, Asheville locals are probably gonna become more hostile toward travellers."
Would I give a shit if someone posted selfies of themselves smiling with a raccoon where they stuck rigs in its neck and slit its stomach open and left it tied to a fucking fence???? Yes. Yes, I would. It's just blatant disrespect for a life. But these scumfucks probably don't even respect their own life, so it doesn't surprise me.....It's one thing to utilize road kill or a hunted animal for it's meat/fur/bones and it's quite another to post instagram pics with it's mutilated body like they did. It shows a lot about what kind of human trash they are, and honestly I hope they lose their dogs and someone adopts them.Please reread what I have said.
Would any of you give a shit if it was a raccoon?
Would I give a shit if someone posted selfies of themselves smiling with a raccoon where they stuck rigs in its neck and slit its stomach open and left it tied to a fucking fence???? Yes. Yes, I would.
And AFAIK there was an autopsy performed on the cat and it died of rat poison, likely from eating a poisoned rat.
the user stated:
which means, 'as far as i know'. which would make this an anecdotal statement, rather than a statement of fact based on sources.
No need for the hostility man . I never said what they did was right or painted them as saints. My point was that they didn't kill the fucking cat. It was roadkill already. If you think I painted a picture of them as saints you can GTFO with that shit. My ONLY points was that they ain't the killers and there dogs are well. That is all . I said my pieceExactly, @roughdraft .
Beyond that, I think the majority of the people who have gotten involved in this thread tend to believe they might not have been the cat killers themselves. But this isn't just about whether or not those individuals killed the cat themselves.
@Bryan Fucking Jones You know those dogs that are so well taken care of that you mentioned? I bet you fucking anything that these oogles would be hella pissed if their dogs died of even natural causes and before they could give them a proper burial some assholes came along and stabbed them up with heroin needles and took pictures like this.
Bet you ANYTHING they'd be out for revenge and everything else if that's how they found their dogs. That's what this is about, disrespecting the life of that cat and the owners and so much more. If they killed the cat that's just worse is all.
Don't try to paint it like it was one of them casually meandering down the road, sees what might be a cat in distress.. wait, is that.. is that poor cat dead or can I help it? Hmm, lemme try to first find a stick and I'll just give it a little budge to see if it's alive before I get my hands all corpsy.
They stuck rigs in it's neck, jabbed their knives into it's guts and who knows what else off camera. They're not saints, GTFO with that shit!