G
Grace
Guest
So my friends are all conspiracy theorists, and I count myself amongst them. We frequent this website called http://www.digg.com which offers access to many articles often hidden or retracted or otherwise invalidated but bring up some seriously alarming reports on the government, big corporations, and religion. Anyway, we were talking recently about the impending end of the world, and one of my friends spoke on a Treaty that was signed two years ago by George Bush that I, and no one I've mentioned it to, have/has never heard of.
The treaty was a decision which would, within the next 5-7 years, implement a united currency and policy within North America. It's called the North American Union and you can read about it on Wikipedia here: [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_american_union"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_american_union[/ame]
Basically, the plan is to syncronize all currency in the countries of the United States, Canada, and Mexico. It seems to be a plan based on economics, but really what I wonder about is the inevitably policy change that would come as a result. The United States, being both the most economically powerful and also politically powerful, in the global spectrum, of the three, would subsequently "rule" over Canada and Mexico.
In many ways, the North American Union is identical to the European Union. The only problem with a regionalized North America is the way the United States has been fucking up recently, in ways that are unfixable and unforgivable. The worst part is that I have never even heard of this Treaty until recently, and the article posted on wikipedia is incredibly recent considering the elapse of time since the signing of the treaty. I know that we live in a democratic republic, and that America is not ruled by democracy, but this is exactly where problems with the government begin. And if power is to become more centralized in the world -- regions like all of Europe, North America, South America, Africa, Asia and the Antarcticas, then the people of this planet are going to have even less say than before.
Thoughts? Anyone heard of this?
The treaty was a decision which would, within the next 5-7 years, implement a united currency and policy within North America. It's called the North American Union and you can read about it on Wikipedia here: [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_american_union"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_american_union[/ame]
Basically, the plan is to syncronize all currency in the countries of the United States, Canada, and Mexico. It seems to be a plan based on economics, but really what I wonder about is the inevitably policy change that would come as a result. The United States, being both the most economically powerful and also politically powerful, in the global spectrum, of the three, would subsequently "rule" over Canada and Mexico.
In many ways, the North American Union is identical to the European Union. The only problem with a regionalized North America is the way the United States has been fucking up recently, in ways that are unfixable and unforgivable. The worst part is that I have never even heard of this Treaty until recently, and the article posted on wikipedia is incredibly recent considering the elapse of time since the signing of the treaty. I know that we live in a democratic republic, and that America is not ruled by democracy, but this is exactly where problems with the government begin. And if power is to become more centralized in the world -- regions like all of Europe, North America, South America, Africa, Asia and the Antarcticas, then the people of this planet are going to have even less say than before.
Thoughts? Anyone heard of this?