Judge Throws Out Panhandling Law, Says Physical Interaction Is Free Speech (1 Viewer)

Coywolf

Mastering the Art of Houselessness
Joined
Dec 12, 2014
Messages
1,606
Age
31
Current Location
Utah
Website
www.youtube.com
Fuck Arkansas. Praise for the ACLU.

Judge Throws Out Panhandling Law, Says Physical Interaction Is Free Speech - https://www.npr.org/2019/04/02/709251256/judge-throws-out-panhandling-law-says-physical-interaction-is-free-speech


LAW
Judge Throws Out Panhandling Law, Says Physical Interaction Is Free Speech
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • Email
April 2, 20197:48 PM ET
-d069fb629c7ed8bd665a2edb295820d39ca0af55-s100-c85.jpg
MATTHEW S. SCHWARTZ

Twitter
457ebfedd82c5baf58032d2983865eea9358472e-s300-c85-jpg.49769_Judge Throws Out Panhandling Law, Says Physical Interaction Is Free Speech_Politics & Anarchism_Squat the Planet_7:45 PM

Enlarge this image
A man panhandles in the median strip on a street in Portland, Maine, in 2017. A federal judge in Arkansas ruled Tuesday that a law forbidding panhandlers to physically interact with people in cars is unconstitutional.
Robert F. Bukaty/AP


When a panhandler approaches a car in the intersection — his hand out, his eyes wide — that physical interaction is protected by the First Amendment, a federal district judge ruled Monday when he threw out an Arkansas city's panhandling ban.

It's the latest such ban to be found unconstitutional since a 2015 Supreme Court decision made it harder for the government to pass laws regarding the content of speech. That case, Reed v. Town of Gilbert, had to do with regulating church signs, but courts around the country have cited the case as they strike down panhandling laws.
To contend with an increase in panhandling at busy intersections, the city of Hot Springs in 2016 passed an ordinance imposing "an absolute ban" on solicitation on streets or in medians. After the American Civil Liberties Union sued, the city repealed the ordinance, according to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

In 2017, the city passed a new version of the ordinance. This one eliminated all references to panhandling, and instead made it illegal for pedestrians or the occupant of a motor vehicle to "interact physically" while the engine was running on a public roadway.



But that language was still constitutionally problematic, Judge Robert Dawson wrote, because physical interactions can convey love, disgust, sympathy, and myriad other emotions. "All people everywhere routinely communicate non-verbal messages through physical interaction, often without even noticing it," he said. "It is visceral and instinctive, and it is often the quickest way to communicate."

So banning physical interaction between pedestrians and the occupants of a vehicle clearly has free speech implications, the judge wrote. "The Court can think of no reason why a pedestrian would intentionally attempt physical interaction with a motor vehicle or its occupants other than to communicate a message."
"Putting your hand out expresses you need money," attorney Bettina Brownstein, who handled the case for the ACLU, told NPR. "Unless they're obstructing your traffic, your car, or assaulting you in some way," the speech is protected, she said.
But people in their cars may be uncomfortable when panhandlers approach but aren't truly being threatened, said Brownstein. And the First Amendment "takes precedence over everything" – even the right of people to feel comfort in their cars, she said.

"We respect the Court's decision," Hot Springs attorney Brian Albright said via email. "However, the safety of pedestrians and motorists are still a concern for the City." Albright said it's too early to say whether the city will appeal the ruling.
The Reed case "has placed literally every panhandling ordinance in the United States at least under risk," said First Amendment scholar Enrique Armijo, associate dean for academic affairs at Elon University School of Law.
Plenty of cities around the country have seen their panhandling laws struck down, Armijo said. Others have changed them to try to fit the new constitutional landscape. Hot Springs "did a better job than most cities with respect to defining the banned activity in a way that refers more to the conduct than the speech," said Armijo, who thinks the judge's ruling could be overturned on appeal.

"It reads the First Amendment a little too broadly, given precedent," he said.
 
Click here to buy one of our amazing custom bandanas!

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

About us

  • Squat the Planet is the world's largest social network for misfit travelers. Join our community of do-it-yourself nomads and learn how to explore the world by any means necessary.

    More Info

Support StP!

Donations go towards paying our monthly server fees, adding new features to the website, and occasionally putting a burrito in Matt's mouth.

Total amount
$45.00
Goal
$100.00

Monthly Goals

  1. Paying the Bills
    $45.00 of $50.00
    The first $50 in donations go towards paying our monthly server fees and adding new features to the website. Once this goal is reached, we'll see about feeding Matt that burrito.
  2. Buy Matt a Beer
    $45.00 of $75.00
    Now that we have the bills paid for this month, let's give Matt a hearty thank you by buying him a drink for all the hard work he's done for StP. Hopefully his will help keep him from going insane after a long day of squishing website bugs.
  3. Feed Matt a Burrito
    $45.00 of $100.00
    Now that the bills are paid and Matt has a beer in his hand, how about showing him your love by rewarding all his hard work with a big fat burrito to put in his mouth. This will keep him alive while programming new features for the website.
  4. Finance the Shopping Cart
    $45.00 of $200.00
    Now that the bills are paid and Matt is fed, perhaps it's time to start planning for those twilight years under the bridge... if only he had that golden shopping cart all the oogles are bragging about these days.

Latest Status Updates

Macon for a super hot minute. Who what when where?
Finished an initial draft of a floorplan for my new van:
A lot has happened since returning to California. Just two days after returning from the road, I grew the courage to leave my abusive SO and stop hiding her abuse. I returned to my hometown in the Bay Area; I’m now going to stay housed up here until next summer as I recover from trauma and save up for my next adventure. I’ve just gotten a job offer, and will be renting a room of my own here!
I learned a lot about myself and the world on the road, but I know vagabonding is the life for me!
I never did complete an update here, did I?
Well, I rubbertramped all across the country, back from Boston with a fellow moderator from R&V. We drove from there to Las Vegas over the course of a month! I saw 4 national parks, 30 states, and crossed over 6000+ miles. I came back to Los Angeles on June 15th, having achieved my goal of hitchhiking the entire country, and was on the road for over two months.
3 weeks of CDL training starting Monday. Im so excited. Living in semi is an upgrade from living in the van, especially since your getting paid for it! Hells yea!!!
A list of all the magic stores in the U.S. would be a sick feature on stp. Imagine you get off the train desperately in need of smokes and a slam, but you got ran off every corner... Dont worry stp knows exactly where you can get pall malls and some steelies with those foodies you picked up in the last town.
Engineer J Lupo wrote on Matt Derrick's profile.
Happy Birthday, dad!
I really need to find someone catching out around at joseph... I don't know if I can do this for the first time in my own...
you are not immune to propaganda
EastCoastTurtle wrote on sydaavicious's profile.
You sould come chill in Bend. Could show you around. + its super chill out here.